The public deserves a clear explanation for the FBI’s unprecedented raid of Fulton County’s election offices. And we should all demand an end to the Trump administration’s campaign to interfere with elections. bit.ly/45KDIKw
Democracy & Civic Tech
📌 At a Glance
• Government agencies are taking new actions that could limit voting and free speech • These changes might make it harder for regular people to vote or protest • Police are also getting more surveillance tools to watch everyone's activities
339 total posts
• 339 unread
Keyboard shortcuts:
j next, k previous, o open post, e expand/collapse, s save, f follow-up, Enter mark read & advance, ? help
Summary:
• FBI raided election offices in Fulton County without clear public explanation
• Brennan Center calls this part of Trump administration's efforts to interfere with elections
• Public deserves transparency about why this unprecedented action was taken
Summary:
• Brennan Center urges voters to push their state governments to resist federal election interference
• States are responsible for running elections fairly and effectively
• Calls for protecting state authority over election processes
Summary:
• Police get 'free' surveillance tools through trials, donations, and federal grants
• These tools secretly build massive databases on everyone and share data with immigration enforcement
• Cities should refuse these offers to protect residents' privacy
Summary:
• Congress is trying to revive the SAVE Act despite it failing last year
• The bill is described as anti-voter legislation with overwhelming public opposition
• Brennan Center urges people to tell Congress to reject the bill
Summary:
• Post in Spanish warns that constant surveillance systems don't make anyone safer
• Police can access surveillance data without proper oversight
• Community safety shouldn't require giving up basic privacy rights
Summary:
• Brennan Center shares quote about fighting for American democracy's future
• References a podcast interview discussing current democratic challenges
• Highlights ongoing concerns about the state of democratic institutions
Summary:
• President is redefining domestic terrorism in ways that threaten free speech rights
• Could affect people's ability to protest or post on social media
• Aims to impose harsh punishments for actions that aren't actually terrorism
Summary:
• The SAVE Act would be the most restrictive voting law Congress has ever passed
• Brennan Center opposes the legislation as harmful to voting rights
• Brief but strong warning about potential impact on election access
Summary:
• Leonard Leo, a lawyer who never argued cases or held office, quietly reshaped America's legal system
• His behind-the-scenes work led to the current conservative majority on the Supreme Court
• Shows how powerful influence can happen without public visibility or traditional political roles
Summary:
• Number of children in immigration detention has increased six times since Trump's second term began
• Kids at Dilley detention center report missing friends, unable to attend school, and feeling trapped
• Highlights the human impact of immigration policy changes on children's wellbeing
Summary:
• Legal groups filed court papers to stop Justice Department from getting New Hampshire voter files
• The voter data includes sensitive information like partial Social Security numbers
• Civil rights organizations are working together to protect voter privacy
Summary:
• Flock's automated license plate reader cameras claim to make neighborhoods safer but evidence suggests otherwise
• EFF hosting livestream on February 19th to discuss concerns about these surveillance cameras
• Raises questions about whether increased surveillance actually improves public safety
Knight First Amendment Institute @knightcolumbia.org yesterday
Democracy & Civic Tech 75% relevant bluesky
Summary:
• Legal expert argues a government report should be released to the public immediately
• Claims the public has constitutional rights to access this information
• Freedom of Information Act also requires the report to be made available
Knight First Amendment Institute @knightcolumbia.org yesterday
Democracy & Civic Tech 80% relevant bluesky
Summary:
• Legal team asked court to reverse Judge Cannon's decision blocking release of a government report
• They argue Judge Cannon doesn't have legal authority to make decisions about this report
• Part of ongoing legal battle over public access to government information
Knight First Amendment Institute @knightcolumbia.org yesterday
Democracy & Civic Tech 85% relevant bluesky
Summary:
• Legal group filed emergency petition to stop Judge Cannon from potentially destroying Jack Smith's report
• Trump and co-defendants want the Special Counsel's report permanently suppressed and destroyed
• Court battle over whether important government investigation findings will be made public
Summary:
• Second legal petition filed to prevent Judge Cannon from ordering destruction of Jack Smith's Mar-a-Lago report
• Trump's co-defendants are asking the judge to destroy the investigation report permanently
• Legal fight over preserving vs. destroying government investigation documents
Hopium Chronicles @hopiumchronicles.bsky.social yesterday
Democracy & Civic Tech 85% relevant bluesky
Summary:
• Expert says presidents cannot legally cancel elections because states control the voting process
• Addresses public concerns about whether Trump could stop future elections from happening
• Reassures people that elections will continue regardless of who is president
Summary:
• Constitution prevents local authorities from interfering with federal officers doing their jobs properly
• However, when federal agents go beyond their legal authority, there's a duty to hold them accountable
• Highlights the balance between federal authority and local oversight responsibilities
Summary:
• Department of Homeland Security should protect elections by supporting election officials, not attacking them
• Real election security comes from helping officials defend against cyber threats
• Criticizes DHS for promoting partisan legislation instead of focusing on actual security needs
Summary:
• Secretary Noem claims to want stronger election security but her actions suggest otherwise
• Most effective approach would be restoring partnerships and cybersecurity funding that officials actually use
• Information sharing between agencies is crucial for protecting elections
Summary:
• US may face 2026 midterm elections with weaker cybersecurity defenses than before
• Federal and state partnerships for election security are becoming strained
• America could be at a growing disadvantage against foreign countries trying to interfere in elections
Summary:
• Budget cuts and policy changes across government have weakened election cybersecurity defenses
• Reduced ability to counter foreign information campaigns and share intelligence about threats
• Department of Homeland Security among agencies affected by these changes
Summary:
• Homeland Security Secretary held press conference showing major changes in election security approach since 2024
• Analysis breaks down what these policy shifts could mean for 2026 elections
• Highlights significant changes in how government agencies handle election protection
Knight First Amendment Institute @knightcolumbia.org yesterday
Democracy & Civic Tech 80% relevant bluesky
Summary:
• Presidents' Day podcast episode examines limits of presidential power and authority
• Focuses on what happens when the presidency itself threatens free speech rights
• Discusses how the office can become a threat to First Amendment protections
Summary:
• EFF emphasizes continued focus on fighting invasive facial recognition technology
• More people are now seeing real-world risks and dangers of this surveillance technology
• Organization commits to maintaining pressure against privacy-threatening face recognition systems
Summary:
• EFF's team of activists, lawyers, and tech experts work on multiple digital rights and privacy threats
• Organization says they're paying attention to current issues and won't be distracted
• Promises continued fight to protect people's digital rights and privacy
Summary:
• DHS Secretary Noem made false claims about having authority over state and local elections during Arizona event
• Federal government does not have power over local election officials like those in Maricopa County
• Clarifies the limits of federal authority in election oversight
Summary:
• Lawmakers are trying to pass the SAVE Act again, which would prevent millions of Americans from voting
• The bill failed before and advocacy groups want it to fail again
• Calls for people to contact Congress to oppose the voting restrictions
Summary:
• DHS Secretary Kristi Noem falsely claimed she has authority over elections and deciding who votes
• Her statement about ensuring 'the right people vote for the right leaders' is not accurate
• Federal DHS does not have power over state and local election processes
Summary:
• Trump administration raided election offices in Fulton County, Georgia
• This is part of a broader plan to interfere with election processes
• Could affect how future elections are run and monitored
Summary:
• New government grant rules for museums and libraries could limit how American history is taught
• Former agency leaders from both parties are worried about the changes
• Could affect what historical information the public has access to in cultural institutions
Summary:
• President Trump is trying to get a $10 billion payout from the government through a lawsuit
• Common Cause filed legal papers saying this creates a conflict of interest
• Raises questions about officials using their position for personal financial gain
Summary:
• Trump administration is using domestic terrorism investigations against people who oppose government policies
• Legal experts call this a dangerous expansion of presidential power
• Could affect how citizens can safely protest or criticize government actions
Summary:
• Secret document shows Trump administration plans to interfere with state-run elections
• Reveals that sensitive voter data will not be properly secured
• Could undermine states' ability to manage their own voting processes safely
Summary:
• Congress is being asked to reject the SAVE Act again
• Brennan Center wants people to contact representatives to protect voting rights
• Suggests the act could make it harder for people to vote
Summary:
• Government shared thousands of private taxpayer records with immigration enforcement
• Legal protections that kept tax data separate from other agencies have been broken
• Innocent people could face consequences when their private information is misused
Summary:
• Legal expert says sharing taxpayer data improperly is unsafe and illegal
• Could result in serious criminal penalties for those responsible
• Highlights violation of privacy protections for tax information
Summary:
• Investigation reveals Trump administration lawyers from Missouri played key role in Georgia election raid
• Shows behind-the-scenes coordination between federal officials
• Part of larger story about federal interference in state election processes
Summary:
• Federal prosecutor handling Georgia ballot seizure met with top Trump lawyers last fall
• Two of these lawyers had previously tried to overturn Trump's 2020 election loss
• Shows coordination between current officials and those involved in past election challenges
Summary:
• FBI seizure of Georgia election materials was planned much earlier than previously known
• Top Trump administration lawyers held meetings about election integrity since last fall
• Reveals longer timeline of federal involvement in state election matters
Summary:
• SAVE Act would require passport or birth certificate to register to vote
• Over 21 million Americans don't have easy access to these documents
• Could prevent millions of eligible citizens from being able to vote
Summary:
• Federal prosecutor met with Trump lawyers before FBI raided Georgia election center
• Two of the lawyers had previously helped Trump try to overturn the 2020 election
• Shows coordination between current officials and those involved in past election disputes
Summary:
• Trump administration is using terrorism investigations to intimidate Americans
• People are being scared away from protesting or speaking out against government policies
• This threatens basic free speech rights protected by the First Amendment
Summary:
• Expert warns that threats to take over election systems should be taken seriously
• Article explains how federal government could interfere with how elections are run
• Provides guidance on what people can do to protect voting rights this year
Summary:
• Interview explores how access to information is changing in Syria
• Discusses freedom of expression and internet access in the country
• Professor explains what these changes mean for Syrian people
Summary:
• The SAVE Act would prevent millions of American citizens from voting
• Described as Trump's attempt to grab election power through legislation
• Presents voting restrictions as a political power move rather than election security
Knight First Amendment Institute @knightcolumbia.org yesterday
Democracy & Civic Tech 80% relevant bluesky
Summary:
• Expert criticizes how American institutions are responding to Trump's threats
• Despite strong free speech protections, leaders are backing down from defending rights
• Radio interview discusses the disappointing response from powerful organizations
Summary:
• Government tool meant to find non-citizens on voter rolls keeps wrongly flagging actual citizens as non-citizens
• Problem especially affects citizens who were born outside the U.S.
• Election officials are struggling to avoid accidentally blocking eligible voters from voting
Summary:
• Department of Homeland Security rushed out a voter citizenship-checking tool before it was fully ready
• The tool makes frequent mistakes, especially for citizens born outside the U.S.
• Investigation by ProPublica and Texas Tribune found the system was still being updated while in use
Summary:
• Supreme Court Justice said immigration agents would quickly release citizens caught in sweeps
• Investigation found this promise wasn't kept for many American citizens
• Shows gap between what officials promised and what actually happened to people
Summary:
• Reporter visited family detention center in Texas and interviewed children
• Kids shared stories about their lives in detention and what they've lost
• Video content shows inside look at immigrant family detention conditions
Summary:
• Section 230 law has protected online speech for 30 years, including Wikipedia and Yelp reviews
• Yelp's lawyer explains why weakening this protection would hurt regular consumers
• Changes to the law could affect how people share opinions and information online
Summary:
• Privacy advocate argues people should be able to request their own license plate tracking data
• Questions why public information like bus routes or promotional vehicles should be secret
• Part of broader discussion about government surveillance and public data access
Summary:
• Age verification requirements are changing how the internet works
• Discord is the latest platform affected by these new rules
• Shows how age verification laws are reshaping online platforms
Summary:
• School superintendent criticizes state policy of taking money from public schools
• Funding is being redirected to private and charter schools instead
• Official argues this violates the principle of free education for all children
Summary:
• Tech company employees generally want to do the right thing
• Suggests companies should resist improper government data requests from ICE
• Argues this would be an easy way for tech workers to take a stand
Summary:
• Cities are getting 'free' surveillance equipment from tech companies and federal grants
• This equipment locks cities into ongoing costs and forces them to share data with ICE
• Result is gradual erosion of people's civil liberties and privacy rights
Summary:
• COVID-19 killed about 38 people in Albany, Georgia by April 2020, mostly Black residents
• Local officials didn't announce the names of Black victims who died
• When a white judge died, officials made sure to publicly announce her name
Summary:
• New book explores how Congress has successfully fought presidential power grabs in the past
• Author offers solutions for strengthening Congress as an institution
• Publishers Weekly calls it a helpful guide for upcoming elections
Summary:
• Certbot is a free tool that helps websites automatically get security certificates
• Created by EFF and used on millions of websites across the internet
• Part of broader effort to protect people's online freedom and security
Summary:
• Government surveillance systems are targeting people seeking abortions and protesters
• Tax-funded monitoring disproportionately affects communities facing discriminatory policing
• Upcoming livestream will teach communities how to fight back against surveillance
Summary:
• Trump administration is trying to access sensitive voter information from states
• Government has dismantled election security agency and pardoned January 6 participants
• Expert argues there are ways to fight back against these election threats
Summary:
• Justice Department is demanding complete voter lists from all states
• Requests include private information like driver's license numbers
• Government is suing states that refuse to hand over this sensitive data
Summary:
• Article provides concrete steps Congress and states can take against surveillance
• Offers guidance for individuals to protect their privacy
• Focuses on maintaining democratic accountability and oversight
Summary:
• ICE is using data brokers and facial recognition apps to track people
• Agency accesses massive license plate databases for surveillance
• Particularly targets people who document or criticize immigration enforcement
Summary:
• Immigration enforcement is using new tech to track protesters and legal observers
• Tools include phone location tracking, facial recognition, and license plate monitoring
• Raises concerns about government surveillance of people exercising their rights to protest
Knight First Amendment Institute @knightcolumbia.org 2d ago
Democracy & Civic Tech 75% relevant bluesky
Summary:
• Podcast episode discusses press freedom with journalism experts
• Covers whether current threats to journalism are worse than before
• Offers advice for student journalists entering the field
Summary:
• Most election-related court cases in 2022 and 2024 happened in state courts, not federal
• Trump's push to move elections to federal control would violate the Constitution
• Shows how state courts play a bigger role in election decisions than many people realize
Summary:
• SAVE Act is part of Trump administration's election strategy
• Designed to make people distrust elections and voting systems
• Could discourage Americans from participating in elections
Summary:
• Department of Justice is tracking which Congress members search Epstein files
• Government is essentially spying on lawmakers doing their oversight job
• Represents serious breach of separation of powers between branches of government
Summary:
• Age verification laws are designed to control what young people can access online
• Supporters are afraid of teens connecting with ideas outside their parents' control
• Could limit young people's ability to find information and communities online
Summary:
• Trump administration is actively working to undermine election systems
• Includes trying to access sensitive voter information and pardoning January 6 participants
• Article explains how citizens can fight back against these efforts
Summary:
• Main Trump super PAC raised $305 million almost entirely from mega-wealthy donors
• 96% of the money came from people giving $1 million or more
• Shows how small number of ultra-rich individuals can influence elections
Summary:
• New book examines how Congress has successfully fought presidential power grabs in the past
• Offers practical solutions to strengthen Congress as an institution
• Publishers Weekly calls it helpful guidance for upcoming elections
Summary:
• Expert explains threats to "nationalize" and "takeover" elections are serious
• Article provides guidance on how citizens can protect elections this year
• Emphasizes importance of taking these threats seriously rather than dismissing them
Summary:
• Discussion about current threats facing journalists and press freedom
• Covered what should be done to protect news reporting
• Part of ongoing concerns about media being able to do their job freely
Summary:
• Tech executives use 'digital sovereignty' to argue for more corporate control
• Questions whether regular people should have more say over digital technology
• Challenges who really gets to control our digital future - companies or citizens
Summary:
• House Democrat leading efforts to fight corruption and strengthen democracy
• Free virtual event scheduled for February 18th to discuss democratic values
• Focuses on what's needed to renew and protect democratic institutions
Summary:
• New website section launched to track 2026 judicial elections and ballot measures
• Will cover legal challenges to state elections as they happen
• Aims to explain how state and federal election laws work together
Knight First Amendment Institute @knightcolumbia.org 2d ago
Democracy & Civic Tech 75% relevant bluesky
Summary:
• Columbia University's free speech project got recognized in a news roundup
• They're studying how to protect free speech from government attacks under Trump
• Focus is on strengthening democracy during current political crisis
Summary:
• Opinion piece claims Trump administration is undermining election systems
• Writer argues dozens of actions suggest an election 'takeover' is happening
• Raises concerns about threats to democratic voting processes
Sean Morales-Doyle @seanmorales-doyle.bsky.social 2d ago
Democracy & Civic Tech 90% relevant bluesky
Summary:
• Trump has threatened to take control of elections according to New York Times article
• Writer explains why this threat should be taken seriously
• Offers strategies for fighting back against attempts to undermine democratic processes
Summary:
• House Republicans passed the Save Act by a narrow vote of 218-213
• The law will make it harder for American citizens to vote
• Shows ongoing political battles over voting access and election laws
Summary:
• Proposed bills would give the executive branch more control over elections
• This creates risks to having free and fair elections
• Urges people to contact Congress to reject these bills and protect voting rights
Summary:
• Proposed bills would take election authority away from state governments
• Would require states to share citizenship data with federal agencies like ICE
• States could lose election funding if they don't comply with data sharing requirements
Summary:
• Bills would require photo ID for all voting, including mail-in ballots
• Would restrict mail voting practices that millions of people currently use
• Would ban ranked choice voting and increase risk of eligible voters being removed from rolls
Summary:
• Common IDs like driver's licenses and military IDs wouldn't be enough under new voting bills
• People who changed their names (like married women) would face extra barriers
• Birth certificates often don't match current legal names, creating voting problems
Summary:
• New bills would require passport or original birth certificate just to register to vote
• Over 150 million Americans don't have passports and could lose voting rights
• These requirements could block millions of eligible voters from participating
Summary:
• Lawmakers failed to pass the SAVE Act last year but are trying again
• Two new bills called SAVE America Act and MEGA Act target voting access
• These bills could prevent millions of Americans from voting in elections
Summary:
• Trump's main super PAC raised record-breaking amounts of money
• Donors get special benefits for their large contributions
• Shows why we need rules for donation transparency and spending limits
Summary:
• Homeland Security is demanding Google turn over info on people who criticize the government online
• Government is using illegal subpoenas to target critics
• Part of broader concerns about government surveillance and face scanning
Summary:
• Current administration is using Department of Justice as a political weapon
• This creates direct threats to fair elections in 2026
• Former DOJ officials discuss ways to protect future elections
Summary:
• Privacy groups are asking California to stop federal agencies from using hidden license plate readers
• Over 30 organizations joined the effort to remove surveillance equipment from state highways
• Focuses on Border Patrol's covert tracking systems along California borders
Summary:
• New York passed a bill requiring companies to tell customers how long they'll support products
• Technology changes so fast that people need to know if their purchase will become useless
• Helps consumers make better buying decisions and get full value
Summary:
• Tribute to David Farber who understood how government affects digital rights
• He recognized both positive and negative ways government can impact online freedoms
• His work helped shape thinking about civil liberties in the digital world
Summary:
• Other countries have faced threats to their democratic systems
• The United States can learn from how they handled these challenges
• Suggests there are proven strategies for protecting democracy
Summary:
• Politicians are pushing the SAVE Act which would restrict voting rights
• Common Cause created a quiz to help people understand how it affects them
• Tool helps voters learn about potential impacts on their ability to vote
Summary:
• New law would require Americans to show passport or birth certificate to register to vote
• Over 21 million Americans don't have easy access to these documents
• Could make it much harder for many citizens to vote in elections
Summary:
• California should stop allowing federal agencies to use automatic license plate readers on highways
• These cameras track cars along the border without people knowing
• Raises privacy concerns about government surveillance of citizens
Summary:
• Current administration is using Justice Department for political purposes
• This threatens the fairness of upcoming 2026 elections
• Former officials discuss ways to protect voting from political interference